This blog post is from Christopher Russell, Energy Manager.
If you are motivated to reduce energy costs, the sequence of your actions makes a difference. To put it all in perspective, the average household spends about $2,000 to $2,500 per year on energy uses, excluding vehicles. You have three basic energy cost reduction opportunities:
1. Change behavior. You guessed it: turn off appliances and fixtures that you aren’t using. Certain appliance adjustments cost nothing: try lowering the temperature on your water heater to 120°. Try raising refrigerator and freezer settings. Use that programmable thermostat. Consolidate or eliminate appliances, if possible. Enable the “sleep” mode on computers, fax machines, and other appliances that have them. Use power strips with an on/off switch for “families” of appliances, like home entertainment centers and computers.
2. Low cost tune ups. Get seasonal tune-ups for furnaces, water heaters, and air conditioners. Maintain clean filters on air conditioners, refrigerators, and dehumidifiers. Weatherstrip windows and doors. Seal air leaks, especially the penetrations to the attic. It’s equally important to seal leaks and insulate around the rim joists, which is where the house’s wood frame interfaces the masonry foundation. Replace inefficient light bulbs with efficient ones.
3. Install efficient appliances. The top priorities are the furnace, air conditioner, water heater, and refrigerator. Look for the Energy Star label when it’s time to replace these items, as well as washers, clothes dryers, televisions, and computers.
Conventional wisdom suggests that we pursue the no– and low-cost items first. The idea is that savings from low-cost efforts provide the cash flow to subsidize the next round of initiatives. In general, I agree with this approach, but the reasoning goes a bit deeper. The sequence of energy improvement activities makes a difference both in your comfort and in your cash flow. Here’s why the sequence of implementation matters:
A furnace or air conditioner should be properly sized to meet the needs of the building that it serves. Specifically, the unit’s size is primarily a function of the house’s square footage and number of doors and windows—and it’s a function of how much the building “leaks” through air gaps and radiant losses.
The leaks and radiant losses consume energy first, before satisfying your internal heating and cooling needs. The leakier the building, the larger the capacity of the furnace, boiler, or air conditioning unit that’s required to serve it. That’s why air sealing and insulation should come first. Not only are these low cost measures that bring instant results, they can also reduce the capacity needed when it’s time to replace your current heating and cooling equipment.
Want an example of real-life savings? This will be the subject of a future blog post, but my own space heating (natural gas) experience since August 2010 shows that I have shaved 30 percent off the gas bill altogether, with 11 percent attributable to improved insulation and air sealing and another 19 percent thanks to the installation of a high (93%) efficiency boiler with an indirect water heating system (see Energy Savers.Gov for a more detailed explanation).
